<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pidgin Pulls a Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/</link>
	<description>crunchy nuggets, served semi-daily</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:05:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dangerous Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dangerous Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox#comment-320</guid>
		<description>I have spoken with the developers of Gaim in the past, and it comes across as if they know the right way to build the application, they know what the application should be, and if the user disagrees, they just don&#039;t know or don&#039;t understand how gaim works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The result is that features people like are removed because &#039;the developer knows best how it should be done&#039; and people are disgruntled.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Take Adium as an example. The default text entry ares is one line, and it auto expands as you type. But you can click and drag it if you want it bigger. How hard would it honestly have been to implement that feature in Pidgin? In fact, the resizable feature was there - and it was DELIBERATELY removed! This is definitely a case of &quot;we&#039;ll tell you how the application works, if you don&#039;t like it, it&#039;s because you just don&#039;t get it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spoken with the developers of Gaim in the past, and it comes across as if they know the right way to build the application, they know what the application should be, and if the user disagrees, they just don&#8217;t know or don&#8217;t understand how gaim works.</p>
<p>The result is that features people like are removed because &#8216;the developer knows best how it should be done&#8217; and people are disgruntled.</p>
<p>Take Adium as an example. The default text entry ares is one line, and it auto expands as you type. But you can click and drag it if you want it bigger. How hard would it honestly have been to implement that feature in Pidgin? In fact, the resizable feature was there &#8211; and it was DELIBERATELY removed! This is definitely a case of &#8220;we&#8217;ll tell you how the application works, if you don&#8217;t like it, it&#8217;s because you just don&#8217;t get it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l3v1</title>
		<link>http://www.firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>l3v1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Do they really forget that &quot;users are important&quot; ? I don&#039;t think so. It&#039;s really hard to please everyone. Especially when some users feel they represent all the users there can be and that a single preference is the preference of the masses. I don&#039;t say this pidgin stuff is a good move, hell no, yet, if it stops behaving the way you expect it to, well, use something else. It&#039;s not like we wouldn&#039;t have enough multiprotocol messengers. Anyway, I highly doubt the devs will leave this behavior to stay like this for good. The firefox-rss matter... I never understood [well, in fact I do, nevertheless] why someone wanted to use a browser as a feed agregator when we have so many good tools - online and local apps - for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do they really forget that &#8220;users are important&#8221; ? I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s really hard to please everyone. Especially when some users feel they represent all the users there can be and that a single preference is the preference of the masses. I don&#8217;t say this pidgin stuff is a good move, hell no, yet, if it stops behaving the way you expect it to, well, use something else. It&#8217;s not like we wouldn&#8217;t have enough multiprotocol messengers. Anyway, I highly doubt the devs will leave this behavior to stay like this for good. The firefox-rss matter&#8230; I never understood [well, in fact I do, nevertheless] why someone wanted to use a browser as a feed agregator when we have so many good tools &#8211; online and local apps &#8211; for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mezz</title>
		<link>http://www.firsttube.com/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>mezz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://firsttubecom/read/Pidgin-Pulls-a-Firefox#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Plugin: &lt;a href=&quot; http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/5296&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;developer.pidgin.im&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Forked project: &lt;a href=&quot; http://funpidgin.sourceforge.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;funpidgin.sourceforge.net&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plugin: <a href=" <a href="http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/5296" rel="nofollow">http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/5296</a>&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>developer.pidgin.im<br />
Forked project: <a href=" <a href="http://funpidgin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://funpidgin.sourceforge.net/</a>&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;>funpidgin.sourceforge.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

